This Supreme Court jurisprudence states that a high religious court (Pengadilan Tinggi Agama), while overturning the decision of a religious court (Pengadilan Agama), incorrectly applied the law because it failed to properly consider the exception submitted by the cassation respondent/original defendant, that the cassation applicant/original plaintiff was domiciled in Klaten. This was a relevant consideration given the relative authority of the court.