SHARIAsource

This mayoral instruction sets out the relevant dates, times, and curriculum, to be taught by all schools in Padang during the month of Ramadhan.

Constitution for Botswana in English, published with the permission of Constitute.

The Western Cape High Court in Cape Town declared the 1953 Wills Act inconsistent with the South Africa Constitution, because the statute’s provisions were previously interpreted to recognize only legal marriage and not Muslim marriages.

Constitution for Namibia in English, published with the permission of Constitute.

Constitution for South Africa in English, published with the permission of Constitute.

Constitution for Swaziland in English, published with the permission of Constitute.

Constitution for Lesotho in English, published with the permission of Constitute.

English translation of the 1975 Constitution of the People's Republic of Mozambique.

English translation of the 1978 Constitution of Mozambique (1975 Constitution of the People's Republic of Mozambique, as amended to 1978).

English translation of the 1990 Constitution of the Republic of Mozambique.

English translation of the 2004 Constitution of the Republic of Mozambique.

English translation of the 2007 Constitution of Mozambique (2004 Constitution of the Republic of Mozambique, as amended to 2007).

English translation of the 2018 Constitution of Mozambique (2004 Constitution of the Republic of Mozambique, as amended by 2018).

On June 28, 2022, the Constitutional Court of South Africa confirmed the Supreme Court of Appeal order that the state must amend existing legislation or enact new legislation to recognize and regulate the consequences of Muslim marriages. The order declared certain provisions of the Marriage Act and the Divorce Act unconstitutional due to the persistent non-recognition of Muslim marriages, or marriages solemnized in accordance with the tenets of sharīʿa, that have resulted in the infringement of fundamental rights of parties to Muslim marriages, and Muslim women and children in particular. The Constitutional Court confirmed this order stating that “the common law definition of marriage is declared to be inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid to the extent that it excludes Muslim marriages.”

In its judgment dated October 10, 2023, the Constitutional Court of South Africa (the "Court") interpreted section 7(3) of South Africa's Divorce Act. The relevant provision allowed redistribution orders from one spouse to another in marriages that took place "out of the community of property," where marital assets are kept separate between the spouses at all times. Instead, the section introduced an "accrual system" for out-of-community property marriages, allowing spouses, in the event of the marriage's dissolution, to claim from the other spouse some of the assets accruing during the marriage as equitable relief. While the section has been lauded for protecting financially vulnerable spouses, especially those whose domestic and reproductive labor went unnoticed, the Court still invalidated the section to the extent that it excluded two groups from its coverage: (1) spouses who married out of the community of property without accrual after November 1, 1984 (the section's cut-off date) and whose marriage ended through divorce; and (2) spouses who married out of the community of property without accrual before or after November 1, 1984, and whose marriages ended through death.

The Court's judgment has been interpreted as extending the accrual system protections to these two groups. One commentator, Waheeda Amien (University of Cape Town), noted in her contribution to The Conversation: "The Court's judgment will provide much-needed financial relief to spouses whose marriages out of the community of property without accrual end, regardless of when the parties were married or how the marriage ended."  The same piece also noted the impact of the judgment on Muslim marriages in South Africa: now, spouses in Muslim marriages that are out of community of property without accrual, too, will be able to ask courts to order the redistribution of marital assets in the event the marriage ends.